Globalism is actually Chinese Nationalism

The White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy’s report on China’s economic aggression is a fascinating read.

With every example it gives of Chinese economic policy advancing Chinese interests, I thought to myself, “It would be awesome if the US adopted precisely these same policies with respect to foreign companies operating in the US.”

The Report showcases a country– China– acting in its own national interest without paying even lip service to any other interest whatsoever. While reading the report, it occurred to me that every globalist policy has the effect of benefiting China. Without exception, globalist policies throttle non-Chinese business and industry, leaving Chinese business and industry stronger.

Do you believe in coincidences?

The globalist rank and file long ago drank their own cool aid and now sincerely believe their propaganda. That leads to some very strange policies. Globalist environmentalism, for example, has practically dismantled Canada’s steel industry. The result is that Canada is dependent on China as a source for “Canadian” steel which it then exports to the US duty-free under NAFTA.

[When I was in school in the 20th Century, I was taught that the definition of a colony was a territory that was a source of raw materials for the mother country and a market for finished goods. By that definition, we are being colonized by Communist China.]

Without Chinese steel, there would be no Canadian auto manufacturing to speak of. Yet Canadian globalists sincerely believe that they are doing the right thing for “the environment” by de-industrializing.

Globalist environmental policy moves Chinese people to Vancouver while shutting down clean Canadian industry and shifting production to polluting China. [First Law of Thermodynamics: you can never win. Second Law of Thermodynamics: you can’t even tie.]

A couple of years ago, seemingly out of nowhere, globalist environmentalists in Washington State tried to block oil shipments out of a refinery. No one bothered to point out that every single one of them drove there, almost all from Seattle. This was similar to a “protest” several years earlier when globalist environmentalists tried to block an oil platform transiting through a Seattle area waterway… using their plastic kayaks. No one noticed the disconnect. How many of their petroleum-based kayaks were made in China?

In both instances, the globalist environmentalists not only increased the demand for fossil fuels, they simply attacked American production, effectively driving up prices and thereby driving oil extraction towards countries with comparatively few or lax environmental laws.

A few days ago, I saw globalists waving signs over the freeway saying “Save the salmon.” I thought to myself, “don’t eat seafood! The Chinese need it.”

Pervasive globalist environmental propaganda has convinced many people in western Washington to accept the premise that there is a shortage of water and that something– urgently– must be done about it. This is despite the fact that there is not now, nor has there ever been, a shortage of water anywhere in western Washington. The region is a temperate rain forest. In fact, water is so plentiful that it wasn’t even metered in my town until globalist judges recently required it. Water is so abundant that it is irrational– quite literally irrational– to meter it because the costs of doing so exceed the value of the thing being metered.

What would it look like if mass media convinced people in the Sahara to discard their own experience and adopt the belief that sand is scarce and needs to be conserved? I have a difficult time imagining such an absurdity, but that is what is going on with respect to water in western Washington.

Globalist policies hobble industry everywhere but in China. Thus, globalist environmental policies increase global pollution by driving industry out of clean developed nations and into Communist China, where polluting is the norm.

Delve deeply into the funding of environmental movements and you’ll find Chinese influence.

In recent years, we have seen organized mobs attack the symbols of our history by tearing down statues while their foreign-owned media allies push for streets and parks to be renamed for those who want us dead. Where have we seen such tactics before?

The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution.

Mass media fanning mob violence is a tactic of the Chinese Communist Party.

China is thousands of years old. The US is a comparative baby. We are too immature to accept that our enemies will hijack our institutions and turn them against us if we permit them to. But that is precisely what the Chinese are doing right now, this instant, today. They have quietly bought up real estate all up and down the west coast. Chinese absentee owners often remove their properties from commerce altogether.

Foreign ownership of business and real estate is per se contrary to any country’s national interest.

Consider this 2005 speech by the Vice-Chairman Of China’s Military Commission in light of the foregoing. That vision represents the military plans in harmony with China’s economic aggression against the West, particularly the US.

China cannot feed itself and its economic model is dependent on exports. In other words, China cannot produce what it consumes and cannot consume what it produces. China therefore must take over foreign food production (example: Smithfield farms) and must stymie non-Chinese industry at every turn (example: every globalist environmental regulation everywhere) in order to survive in its current form and at current population levels.

So-called “free trade” advances Chinese industrial interests at the expense of our own. Our politicians are for sale, and it is business as usual for lobbyists to write legislation on behalf of their multinational clients. Those multinational clients eagerly trade away American sovereignty for access to China’s markets on China’s terms.

We also see this in the attacks on our free speech. In American jurisprudence, there is no such thing as “hate speech”. But that isn’t taught in any school or promulgated in any media outlet. On the contrary, social media companies such as Facebook (and others) actively seek to deplatform nationalist ideas under the guise of combating “hate speech.” In other words, it is corporate censorship. And corporate censorship is a requirement for access to the Chinese social media market. Globalist speech policies are precisely aligned with Communist Chinese interests.

In light of General Chi’s speech about a military plan against the US, it is interesting to note that globalists attack the Second Amendment at every opportunity.

In other words, globalism aims to seize our industries, take over our agriculture, hijack our laws, impose pro-Chinese censorship on our communications, and disarm us in the process.

Is it any wonder that globalism also aggressively promotes homosexuality, not having children “for the environment”, normalizing the madness of so-called “gender” dysphoria, funding abortion on demand, and promoting other policies that destroy the family and white reproduction?

TrudeausAndDonts

This is the Prime Minister of Canada

The Chinese play a long game, and think in terms far longer than we have even existed. China’s goal is nothing less than the complete takeover of the US which is also, precisely, the goal of globalism.

It all fits together: Globalism is actually Chinese nationalism.

3 thoughts on “Globalism is actually Chinese Nationalism

  1. Globalism predates Chinese coming of (modern) age. While they are indeed the most obvious local benefactor of western self-harm, it would be a tragic misreading of recent history not to identify the other very highly intellectual diaspora that expended a fantastic amount of capital and manpower to drive the worst excesses of the left into the western mainstream.

    Enjoy your sabbath!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Globalism is actually Chinese Nationalism | Reaction Times

Leave a comment