The Calm Before The Storm?

There’s all manner of chatter on /pol/ and Twatter about a large number of sealed indictments in federal courts across the country. Perhaps this is business as usual, perhaps not.

If it is Trump’s “calm before the storm,” here’s my take on how it may be unfolding.

It is axiomatic that since the US went off the golf standard in the early 1970s, fiat dollars can only ultimately be spent in the US; the dollar has no inherent value. It is fiat currency only, although it is de facto tied to petroleum because OPEC transactions are in dollars.

As the US spent fiat dollars purchasing Arab oil (and, later, Chinese-made consumer goods), those dollars necessarily flowed back to the US. However, not in a way we might have hoped.

For decades, Arabs (i.e. Muslims) and Chinese have been using fiat US dollars to lobby for legislation favorable to their nations. That they would do so is also axiomatic; it’s how laws are made in this country. Americans are extremely naive in that the US is only 241 years old while Arab countries and China are thousands of years old. Until 2016, it did not appear to concern many Americans that this has been the case.

It is my conjecture that, during his trip to Saudi Arabia, President Trump made a deal with King Salman to cut off the flow of such money to US lobbyists and politicians.

It is my further conjecture that during his current trip to Asia, President Trump has made a deal with President Xi to cut off the flow of Chinese money to US lobbyists and politicians. Chinese money has very quietly bought up the most valuable real estate on the entire west coast of North America. It has pushed house prices beyond the reach of the middle class. That is political instability per se.

It also appears as if Chinese money has bought politicians, particularly west coast Democrats, which are enacting legislation at the state and municipal level that directly attack property rights using “the environment” as a pretext. For example, in western Washington State it is impossible to get a well-drilling permit without first proving that one’s proposed well will not have a negative impact on someone with more senior water rights elsewhere. Aside from the logical impossibility of proving a negative, the premise itself is absurd; there is not now, nor has there ever been, a shortage of water anywhere in western Washington. So building single family homes (i.e. the American dream) is increasingly difficult and expensive. Yet Chinese- and Japanese-owned development companies are building high rise, Agenda 21 compliant, multi-family residential living facilities without a peep in the (foreign owned) media about “muh water.”

Fortunately, transferring wealth out of China is looked upon with great disfavor by the Chinese government. Doing so is a crime, and astonishing levels of wealth that has moved out of China and into the US is, from the Chinese perspective, political corruption per se.

The coming storm may very well be the prosecution for corruption of US politicians and law firms for serving as agents of foreign powers, and other crimes of corruption. If this is the case, expect to see indictments of high level politicians in both political parties.

As far as I’m concerned, this can’t happen fast enough. Let the chips fall where they may: every politician in both parties that have sold out the American national interest should go to prison.

“If that fucking bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!”– Hillary Clinton, speaking on behalf of swamp creatures.

Bring on the storm.



The Church has been in precipitous decline since Vatican II, and not just the Roman Catholic Church. Protestant denominations have in many cases accelerated past the Roman Church, if only because it takes a little longer to reverse several millennia of supposedly unchangeable doctrine.

Here is an example of how far the Church has declined. One can make a very sound theological argument that the Church is now largely (no pun intended) Satanic.

This is a photo of a communist demonstration against Trump in Philadelphia earlier today, from Twitter account of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Local 13. The people in the foreground left and right (it’s all left, really) purport to be clergy.


Are We Being Prayed?

This is based on a comment I made earlier today at The Conservative Treehouse.

I’m beginning to form the opinion that China is behind the US push to confront Russia.

Our laws are drafted by lobbyist law firms on behalf of their clients and then presented to Congressmen and Senators for enactment. No Senator writes legislation. Hell, much of the time they may not even know who the client is.

Trade imbalances matter. For a generation, we have been sending fiat currency to China to pay for cheap consumer goods. That money can ultimately only be spent in the US, and boy are they spending it here. The Chinese have been buying up so much real estate on the west coast that the market is beyond the reach of middle class Americans. Check the price of a house– any house at all– in any west coast city and tell me who can afford one. Is it merely a coincidence that west coast cities are the US ports closest to China?

Why are California, Oregon and Washington– among other states– entering into agreements with China (in violation of Article 1, Section 10 of the US Constitution) to adhere to the Paris Climate Accords, which restrict US energy and industrial activity? From any standpoint or ideology, such agreements are against US interests. And yet they are being made.

Why are so many cities and towns in those states defying federal law and being “sanctuary cities”? Why has California and other slave states enacted the provisions of the UN Small Arms Treaty in defiance of the Second Amendment? Why did a super majority of both parties in Congress just vote to place tremendous economic sanctions against Russia, exactly? Again, viewed from the national interest, this is not something that should have passed Congress. And yet it did, with astonishing speed.

What US national interest, exactly, is advanced by NATO operating on former Soviet territory? I’m unable to identify one. Why is the US taking any position at all about the government and territory of Ukraine, which is as firmly in the Russian sphere of influence as Mexico is in ours?

Cui bono?

China bonos, that’s who. China benefits immediately and directly from any conflict between Russia and the US, up to and including hot war.

China is thousands of years old and the Chinese play a long game, with rules (if any) very different from ours. We’re 241 years old and still wet behind the ears. We should be very wary about being drawn into ancient Asian rivalries. I believe that China (and Middle Eastern countries) are using their billions of US dollars to pay American lobbyists to draft legislation that favors their interests. Why wouldn’t they? Our government– federal, state, and local– is being hijacked by foreign interests. I’m not suggesting that individual lawmakers at any level are necessarily even aware of this. They’re just following their lobbyist’s orders.

We need major legal reform if we are to survive as a sovereign nation. Lobbying on behalf of any foreign entity should be defined as treason and made a capital offense.

We’re being prayed, bigry.

Two Constitutional Crises Coming Soon

Two major constitutional crises are on the short-term horizon.

The first is the recent 4th Circuit decision upholding a lower court ruling against the so-called “travel ban.” There’s more than a hundred pages of gobbledy-gook, but the only way the court could reach that decision was to extend the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause to the entire world. Otherwise, the plaintiffs would not have had standing to sue. You can read it here. If your eyes glaze over, skip to the dissent. If the Supreme Court upholds this decision by making something up that isn’t in the Constitution (typical), the Globalists will have won their battle in court. The Nationalists, who want to preserve US sovereignty and the makeup of our society, would have nothing to lose by going hot. On the other hand, if the Court rules in favor of the ban, it would be a victory for those who value the rule of law (Nationalists), and a setback for the Global Left, which doesn’t ever play by the rules, admit defeat, or go away. The Left is extremely violent, as history has shown over and over. The Left in such a situation could go hot, although I think that’s much less likely than the reverse scenario because they are in power in California, NY, and a few other large Blue States. (If the court splits 4 to 4, the 4th Circuit decision stands. That’s the worse possible outcome, in my opinion, but it could happen if Justice Ginzburg expires before a decision is handed down, or recuses herself because of her campaign comments and/or Justice Kennedy cucks.)

In no case is the division between “liberal” and “conservative.” It is between Nationalists and Globalists, which will make for some very interesting alliances and curious bed fellows (such as lifelong Democrats voting for Trump and Recucklicans like McStain, Ryan, and McConnell seeking to thwart their own party’s president whenever possible).

The second constitutional crisis is California and other states signing “agreements” with foreign governments. Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution explicitly forbids states entering into treaties, but that is precisely what California, Oregon, Washington are doing. Other states have announced they will go along with California: Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and wannabe Puerto Rico. The last is of course not even a state.

There is definitely a gigantic collision on the near horizon because of these two intractable issues.

The Paris Climate Accords (which no one in media or social media on either side of the issue has read, or is even remotely familiar with in any meaningful way) is not about the weather. Climate change is too nebulous and in any event cannot be reduced to a testable hypothesis. This is a deliberate move by the Globalists, who are maneuvering to transfer wealth from the US to China and elsewhere.

I put the odds of California increasingly ignoring the federal Constitution at 100%. Oregon and Washington’s governments will go along with California’s, although majority populations in counties east of the Cascades will not want to. There’s not much they could do about it, except perhaps to join Idaho. Will the coastal blue parts of those states say good riddance and to each his own? That’s the best case scenario.

What will the federal government do about California? I am 100% certain that China will back California like we back Taiwan, and there’s not much the Federal government could do about California’s actions short of going to war with California, which I think is unlikely.

Our mass media is either outright owned/majority shareholder-controlled by foreigners (Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Fox, Twitter, etc.) or global corporations (CNN, Facebook, Hollywood studios, etc.) that are inimical to a sovereign US. Thus you can be assured that the level of shilling and fake news will continue to increase even beyond their already hysterical levels.

The tricky part: California agriculture feeds much of the US, but California agribusiness is dependent on the rest of the US for the water it needs to do so. Our times are about to get very, very interesting.

Either Trump will be impeached and removed from office through an exercise of raw globalist power or top-level Globalists in both parties are going to jail.

I don’t know the outcomes of any of these scenarios, I’m just certain that they are headed our way, and fast.

The Dutch Vote No

Today the Dutch voted on whether to approve a treaty with Ukraine. While votes are still being counted, it is clear that the overwhelming majority of voters who participated voted No.

There’s a catch: in order to have any legal effect, voter participation must have been 30% of the electorate. Different sources are quoting different numbers: I’ve read 29% to 33% so far.

Regardless of whether the statutory participation is met or not, the No vote is a very positive sign. Globalism is against the national interest of every single country and ethnic group, with one (((exception))). Thus it is in the national interest of every nation and ethnic group to fight the globalization of their own countries. Globalism is destroying Europe and the US, and people are beginning to uncuck themselves.

Of course, democracy is the problem. It allows– even encourages– globalist forces to simply buy governments and implement their globalist policies. There can be no democratic fix to democracy.

But I do hope that powerful nationalists can win some elections. A revolution from above is more likely to work in Europe and America than anything else, in my opinion. There isn’t going to be a coup anywhere in the First World. Or at least there won’t be one we’d recognize as such. We shall see. 2017 is going to be a very interesting year. Stand by for more antics by criminal gangs hired by leftist/globalist forces in Europe and the US. It appears that this particular current year is going to make 1968 look like a walk in the park.

The groundswell of popular support for Trump is a sign of popular support for nationalist leadership in the US, just as the Dutch No vote is a sign of popular support for nationalist leadership in the Netherlands. Nationalism is natural; globalism is artificial, and it requires (((mass media))) to sustain it.

There will be no mass media when the electrical power plants stop working…